New college should be north of Everett

by John Koster

  • Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:50pm
  • Opinion

John Koster

by John Koster
Snohomish County Council, District 1

The facts are clear. We need a four-year college in Snohomish County one that focuses on math and the sciences, a polytechnical college.
As a state representative in the late 1990s, I helped draft legislation to study where in the state were the greatest needs for higher-education facilities. We knew then that siting more colleges and vocational schools would be a requirement to ensure and protect our childrens futures. Snohomish Countys current population of 670,000 is projected to be nearly 1 million residents by 2025 a short 18 years from now. Snohomish County is currently the largest county in the U.S. without a four-year higher-education institution. Now is the time to remedy that.
Moreover, our supply of engineers in all fields is so inadequate that neither the public nor the private sector can fill all their engineering vacancies, not to mention the growing need for health-care professionals.
The state is planning a branch site for the University of Washington in north Puget Sound. The governor says this campus should focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics. We need a four-year polytechnical college in north Snohomish County.
The governors task force is seeking the right location for this four-year college, which is to serve the citizens of Island, Skagit and Snohomish counties. Finding the right site should be based on our citizens needs and good, practical common sense. It should not be based on politics. The location must fulfill the intent of legislation, not cave to pressures from local politicians seeking the economic windfall that a new college may bring.
The selected site must be readily accessible for all students from the three-county service area. The site must be transit-friendly and commuter-friendly. The site must have room for future growth.
The two Everett sites under consideration make no sense. One is an industrial site requiring costly cleanup with no room for future campus growth, and the other is in the floodplain.
The only sites that make practical, common sense to consider are those located north of Everett. Only a north Snohomish County site can provide student accessibility, transit service and room for growth. A north county location will serve everyone in the three-county service area. Building at any site south of Marysville will run commuting students into the midst of already heavy traffic.
Without an easily accessible, affordable, centrally located north county college, our citizens may not have the opportunity to develop the skills and acquire the knowledge needed to build their tomorrow. This is an outcome we cannot tolerate.

More in Opinion

Hits and misses

Hits The city of Marysville for considering helping the health district financially.… Continue reading

Marysville’s come a long way this past decade

As we approach the end of the current decade, I thought it… Continue reading

Lakewood School District proposes renewing 2 levies in 2020

At its Nov. 20 meeting, the Lakewood School District Board of Directors… Continue reading

Make Christmas merrier with a home this December

Charles Dickens’ Ebenezer Scrooge was a mean old miser that loathed Christmas… Continue reading

SnoCo conservatives get out the vote

By Jerry Cornfield OLYMPIA — Voters across the state had their… Continue reading

Billy Frank coalition works on salmon recovery

By Lorraine Loomis The Billy Frank Jr. Salmon Coalition is looking forward… Continue reading

Public input sought for Arlington’s downtown plan

By Barb Tolbert Arlington enjoys a vibrant downtown business core with a… Continue reading

Growth not optional when it comes to Marysville

I’ve heard it said that, “Change is inevitable and growth is optional.”… Continue reading

Hits and misses

Hits Salvation Army for bringing a cold-weather shelter back to Marysville. It… Continue reading