Is ‘Job Creation’ really just ‘Job Destruction?’ | LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Hypocrisy is “the practice of professing standards, beliefs, etc., contrary to one’s real character or actual behavior.” There doesn’t seem a more clear example of exactly this when one hears Pres. Obama’s words about “job creation” and then reads that under his administration, the EPA, in this case, will actually destroy 1.44 million jobs. So, is “job creation” just another word for “job destruction?”

Hypocrisy is “the practice of professing standards, beliefs, etc., contrary to one’s real character or actual behavior.”

There doesn’t seem a more clear example of exactly this when one hears Pres. Obama’s words about “job creation” and then reads that under his administration, the EPA, in this case, will actually destroy 1.44 million jobs. So, is “job creation” just another word for “job destruction?”

Besides destroying jobs, these proposed EPA regulations will also increase the costs of electricity as much as 23 percent in some areas, average of 11.5 percent nationwide and would have a substantial impact on raising prices of natural gas as well.

This statistic is from the federal government’s own data which was discovered when an analysis was completed for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity and is the result of primarily two new regulations being proposed by the EPA. One is the “Maximum Achievable Control Technology” and the other is the “Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.”

And, the EPA’s air pollution rules may even extend to your own backyard as you “disturb” your own soil to plant a garden which may result in soil particles becoming air borne and “contaminating” something, someplace else. So, in addition, to potentially losing your job, paying a lot more for electricity and heat, you may have the additional burden of paying high fines to the EPA for air, water, dirt, plant and finally people pollution.

Senator Maria Cantwell supports these measures as does Senator Patty Murray, but Cantwell has gone a step further by calling for the EPA to preemptively prohibit resource development in a huge area of Alaska — an area rich with copper, gold and other valuable metals. She wants the EPA to deny the permit before it has even been applied for. If this occurs, the precedent could potentially lock up lands throughout the U.S.

So, while “job creation” is the buzz word for the moment, the truth is that this administration and our own elected officials actually prefer job destruction as evidenced by their actions.

Catherine Paxton

Arlington

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Arlington Times brings back great memories

I was doing some searching for archives online and stumbled on the… Continue reading

Thank you letters

The Arlington High School Class of 2018 Parent Group would like to… Continue reading

Where did all the strawberries go?

Where have all the strawberries gone? While I am new to Washington… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

M’ville needs to place a moratorium on development

Letters in support of library levy

We’re urging you to vote yes for libraries on April 24 and… Continue reading

Why some people voted against M’ville school levies

In response to your recent editorial in support of school levies, I… Continue reading

6 Letters to the Editor support M’ville school levies

As a mom of five children who are either current, former or… Continue reading

Vote for Arlington schools

Vote for bonds Arlington voters on Feb. 13 will be asked to… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Miller best pick My personal interaction with Ray Miller veteran to veteran… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

King a neighbor for everyone I am writing this to encourage the… Continue reading

Vote for Jesica Stickles

Elect Stickles This is my recommendation for the re-election of Jesica Stickles… Continue reading