‘At Hope’ kids or who do you think you are fooling?


As if Washington State didn’t have enough problems with trying to make up their revenue shortfalls of over $2.5 billion, nine Senators have decided that it would be better to focus on “control of minutiae.” These nine; Franklin, Kauffman, McAuliffe, McDermott, Regala, Fraser, Keiser, Hatfield and Kilmer have introduced a 61-page bill to remove aka “ban” terms like “at risk,” “in poverty,” or “disadvantaged” and replace every one of those phrases with “at hope.” (SB6249)

First, let’s review the cost of this inane legislation. According to the Senate Accounting and HR Dept., the monthly salary for a Senator is $3,508.84, and monthly Senatorial benefits are about $951.

So, a total of $481,662.72 per year or $1,319.62 per day for the nine Senators is spent.

Based upon about 10 days work, the payroll expense would be $13,196.23. For the paper, copying, support staff, etc., the bill itself probably costs between $3,000 and $6,000. So just to get this idea to the floor costs $17,696.23 (bill plus payroll).

The cost of each day on the Senate floor being about $17,200 (without salaries and benefits), the actual cost of this bill is probably between $20,000 and $25,000 of taxpayer monies. (Not a huge amount by itself, but 700 – 800 Senate bills alone in one session begin to cost all of us lots of money.)

Second, what did the taxpayer get? A suggested ban against describing some children’s real challenges/problems with some politically correct mumbo jumbo which makes absolutely no sense. Their assertion that if you describe a child’s circumstance as “disadvantaged” it will create an adult who manifests ‘a self-fulfilling prophecy of “disadvantaged”’ is simply ridiculous to most common-sense adults.

Kids actually know who may be poor and who isn’t and who is running with the wrong crowd and who isn’t. They don’t need labels. And, a child who is living in a chaotic home with not enough to eat and no support from a “family” will hardly believe him/herself to have no problems simply because a bunch of politicians decided to label him/her “at hope.”

Finally, if the legislature really wanted to do something useful, why not “re-fund” all the medical insurance Gov. Gregoire removed in order to reduce the State deficits. That insurance was for kids and unemployed or underemployed families. The term “at hope” means absolutely nothing concrete to a hungry, abused, neglected child.

If these Senators have nothing better to do, then I suggest they resign and save all of us some money, and since they don’t seem to represent any sane constituency — we don’t want them replaced either.

Catherine Paxton


More in Letters to the Editor

Thanks for participating in putting fire levy on ballot

North County Fire/EMS wants to say thank you. Our Fire Authority recently… Continue reading

Thank to Marysville for another successful Strawberry Festival

The Marysville Strawberry Festival Board of Directors would like to thank you… Continue reading

Community support appeciated

Dear Editor, North County Fire & EMS provides fire suppression and emergency… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Opioid bill flawed, as is request for more money for schools

Schools already get lots of funding

Marysville School District is spending $15,700 per student, yet the union wants… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Socialism worked in Netherlands Steve Powell - what kind of a reporter/journalist… Continue reading

Children’s lives end every Wednesday

A voice for the unborn We are pro-life. We stand peacefully praying… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Thank you to Mr. Powell for exposing the confusing evolution about gender… Continue reading

Here’s another vote for the Arlington school bond

Arlington School District has a bond proposal on the ballot Feb. 12.… Continue reading

More support for Arlington school bonds

Vote for schools We want to voice our support for the Arlington… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Vote for school bonds in Arlington

Please vote yes on Arlington school bonds

Vote for Arlington schools The February and November 2018 school bond proposals… Continue reading